Campus Vrije universiteit

Why Storytelling Matters when Communicating your Research

By Nancy Peiffer

6 May 2026

GET PERSONAL ADVICE

Research findings rarely speak entirely for themselves. In the absence of clear communication, even strong science may fail to resonate. Through storytelling, researchers can structure their work to facilitate understanding and recall, without sacrificing analytical depth.

 

Storytelling is not simplification

There is still a quiet suspicion around storytelling in academia. For some researchers, it sounds like spin. Something softer than “real” research communication. But storytelling is not the opposite of simplification. It is what helps sound findings land where you want in a structure people can understand. If your audience cannot see the question, the stakes, or the meaning of your findings, then strong science can still go unheard. That is why storytelling belongs in the researcher’s toolkit, right alongside writing, presenting, and social media skills. Narrative communication research has repeatedly found that stories can make science more understandable and engaging without replacing evidence.[i]


Stories help audiences find their way

At its best, storytelling gives your communication a backbone. It moves from challenge to method to finding to implication. That sounds simple, but it matters. Cognitive and neuroscience research suggests that narrative supports comprehension and retention. This is because story processing recruits brain systems involved in working memory and meaning-making. Studies of narrative comprehension and brain dynamics point to the role of coherent structure in helping people make sense of complex input. For a researcher, the practical message is clear: when your communication has shape, it becomes easier to follow and is more likely to be remembered.[ii]

Want to make your research clearer, more engaging and more meaningful for your audience? Join our free webinar 'Scientific Storytelling for Researchers' and discover how storytelling can strengthen the way you communicate your work. Register here; https://tinyurl.com/257427zn 

Every audience looks for meaning.

Think about the people you need to reach. Policymakers are trying to make choices under time pressure. Journalists are often covering topics outside their exact expertise. Funders are looking for scientific merit and societal value. Public audiences want to know what the research means in the world they live in. And peers at conferences want a clear contribution and a memorable takeaway. Whoever your audience: be clear, accessible, and explicit about the takeaway.


Results alone are not enough

That is why results alone rarely carry a message far enough. Imagine you study antibiotic resistance. A policymaker may need to know what your findings imply for public health practices. A journalist may need a clear line on why this matters now. The broader public could see how your work connects directly to issues of hospital safety and personal health. A funder may want to see how the project contributes beyond publication counts. While a conference audience may want to know how your work changes the field. Storytelling helps you frame those answers. It turns ‘here is what we found’ into ‘here is why this matters.’


Never let the story outrun the evidence

This is where many researchers rightly become cautious. And they should. Narrative is powerful, which means it needs boundaries. Do not smooth over uncertainty. Do not oversell a single study. Do not confuse a vivid example with a general conclusion. Research on narrative and misinformation makes this point clearly: the same qualities that make stories persuasive can also make them misleading. Good science storytelling keeps methods, limitations, and confidence levels visible. The safest rule is a good one: let the story carry the audience to the evidence, then let the evidence do the persuading. [iii]


Storytelling strengthens scientific impact

In the end, storytelling is not about making research simpler than it is. It is about making it easier to enter. This is not a soft skill, but a professional one. Storytelling helps your work reach the people who can cite it, fund it, report it, apply it, or build on it. And that is exactly what good science communication is for. Far from weakening research, storytelling gives strong evidence a better chance of having impact.[iv]


Customised storytelling training for research organisations

Working with researchers who want to increase the reach and impact of their communication? We deliver in-company Storytelling workshops, designing each programme in close collaboration with universities, research institutes and research teams. Together, we tailor the content to your field, audiences and typical communication situations, such as policy outreach, media work, blogs and opinion articles.
Interested in exploring whether this is a good fit for your organization? Please feel free to get in touch to discuss the options.

 


[i] Dahlstrom, M.F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. PNAS.

[ii] Yarkoni, T. et al. (2008). Neural substrates of narrative comprehension and memory. NeuroImage.

[iii] Dahlstrom, M.F. (2021). The narrative truth about scientific misinformation. PNAS.

[iv] Dahlstrom, M.F. (2014). Using narratives

 

Want to make your research clearer, more engaging and more meaningful for your audience? Join our free webinar 'Scientific Storytelling for Researchers' and discover how storytelling can strengthen the way you communicate your work. Register here; https://tinyurl.com/257427zn 
 

 

Writer: Nancy Peiffer

Meet Nancy, our go-to English language specialist. She creates and fine-tunes training programs and learning materials that are perfectly tailored—whether you’re a professional, student, or researcher.

More about Nancy
certificaat1
certificaat1
certificaat2
certificaat3
certificaat5
crkbo